Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Puget Sound fish monitored for contaminants

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 21:17, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Puget Sound fish monitored for contaminants

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article of unclear notability. I can't find the sources enough to consider a merged with Puget Sound. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 07:41, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:42, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:42, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:43, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Looks like an essay with no hopes for improvement (to the point that I searched for copyvio of the original website, but did not find it - many similar structures but no violation). Moreover, notability is dubious: I know this is not really an argument but the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife ought to be at least more notable that this program, and we do not have an article about it. Tigraan (talk) 11:22, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per WP:GNG PianoDan (talk) 18:31, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.